From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Feldblum v. Laurelton Land Company

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Feb 24, 1914
104 N.E. 1129 (N.Y. 1914)

Opinion

Argued February 3, 1914

Decided February 24, 1914

Clarence E. Thornall for appellant.

Adolph Feldblum and Edward Lazansky for respondent.


Judgment affirmed, with costs; no opinion.

Concur: WERNER, HISCOCK, COLLIN, CUDDEBACK, HOGAN and MILLER, JJ. Not voting: WILLARD BARTLETT, Ch. J.


Summaries of

Feldblum v. Laurelton Land Company

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Feb 24, 1914
104 N.E. 1129 (N.Y. 1914)
Case details for

Feldblum v. Laurelton Land Company

Case Details

Full title:ADOLPH FELDBLUM, Respondent, v . LAURELTON LAND COMPANY, Appellant

Court:Court of Appeals of the State of New York

Date published: Feb 24, 1914

Citations

104 N.E. 1129 (N.Y. 1914)
104 N.E. 1129

Citing Cases

Soderbery v. Laurelton Land Company

Judgment affirmed, with costs. We think that Feldblum v. Laurelton Land Co. ( 151 App. Div. 24; 210 N.Y. 594)…

Smith v. Hoffman

In our opinion, appellant not only failed to make a satisfactory explanation for the 13-year delay in…