From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Feinblum v. Dybner

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Oct 12, 1993
197 A.D.2d 560 (N.Y. App. Div. 1993)

Opinion

October 12, 1993

Appeal from the Supreme Court, Queens County (Lane, J.).


Ordered that the order is reversed, on the law, with costs, the motion is granted, the complaint is dismissed insofar as it is asserted against the defendants Dybner and Popa, and the action against the remaining defendants is severed.

We agree with the defendants' contention that the Supreme Court erred in denying their motion to dismiss the complaint due to the plaintiffs' failure to comply with their 90-day demand pursuant to CPLR 3216. Under the circumstances of this case, the plaintiffs' failure to submit an affidavit by a medical expert mandates dismissal of the complaint (see, Mosberg v. Elahi, 80 N.Y.2d 941; Perez v. Long Is. Jewish-Hillside Med. Ctr., 173 A.D.2d 530). Mangano, P.J., Rosenblatt, Lawrence, Copertino and Joy, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Feinblum v. Dybner

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Oct 12, 1993
197 A.D.2d 560 (N.Y. App. Div. 1993)
Case details for

Feinblum v. Dybner

Case Details

Full title:ROBERT FEINBLUM et al., Respondents, v. RUBIN DYBNER et al., Appellants…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Oct 12, 1993

Citations

197 A.D.2d 560 (N.Y. App. Div. 1993)
604 N.Y.S.2d 754

Citing Cases

Randolph v. Cornell

Accordingly, to avoid dismissal, the plaintiff was required to show both a justifiable excuse for the delay…

Davis v. Cardiovascular Consultants of Long Island, P.C.

To vacate the dismissal of an action pursuant to CPLR 3216, a plaintiff must demonstrate both a reasonable…