From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Feinberg v. Mullin

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department
Nov 11, 1936
249 App. Div. 670 (N.Y. App. Div. 1936)

Opinion

November 11, 1936.


Appeal from order and summary judgment in an action on a promissory note. Plaintiff is the payee in the note. She says that the note was given her to pay an account which defendant originally owed to her husband, which has been assigned to her. The defendant's affidavit filed in opposition to the motion for summary judgment disputes the items of the account and pleads lack of consideration for the note. As between the original parties to the note, such a defense is proper. (Neg. Inst. Law, § 54; Strong v. Sheffield, 144 N.Y. 392, 394; Miller v. Campbell, 173 App. Div. 821; Ulster Finance Corporation v. Schroeder, 230 id. 146.) Judgment and order reversed on the law and facts, with costs, and new trial granted. Hill, P.J., Rhodes, Crapser, Bliss and Heffernan, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Feinberg v. Mullin

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department
Nov 11, 1936
249 App. Div. 670 (N.Y. App. Div. 1936)
Case details for

Feinberg v. Mullin

Case Details

Full title:HANNAH FEINBERG, Respondent, v. JOSEPH MULLIN, Appellant

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department

Date published: Nov 11, 1936

Citations

249 App. Div. 670 (N.Y. App. Div. 1936)

Citing Cases

Pash v. Wagner

The law which precludes an inquiry into the consideration for a negotiable instrument as against bona fide…