From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Feger v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division One.
Sep 18, 2012
378 S.W.3d 421 (Mo. Ct. App. 2012)

Opinion

No. ED 97285.

2012-09-18

Charles FEGER, Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.

Appeal from the Circuit Court of St. Louis County, David Lee Vincent III, Judge. Gwenda Renee Robinson, St. Louis, MO, for appellant. Chris Koster, Shaun J. Mackelprang, Jefferson City, MO, for respondent.


Appeal from the Circuit Court of St. Louis County, David Lee Vincent III, Judge.


Gwenda Renee Robinson, St. Louis, MO, for appellant. Chris Koster, Shaun J. Mackelprang, Jefferson City, MO, for respondent.
Before CLIFFORD H. AHRENS, P.J., GLENN A. NORTON, J., and SHERRI B. SULLIVAN, J.

ORDER


PER CURIAM.

Charles Feger (“Movant”) appeals from the judgment of the motion court denying his request for post-conviction relief pursuant to Rule 29.15 after an evidentiary hearing.

We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and find no error of law. No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum opinion for their information only, setting forth the facts and reasons for this order.

The judgment of the trial court is affirmed in accordance with Rule 84.16(b).


Summaries of

Feger v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division One.
Sep 18, 2012
378 S.W.3d 421 (Mo. Ct. App. 2012)
Case details for

Feger v. State

Case Details

Full title:Charles FEGER, Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.

Court:Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division One.

Date published: Sep 18, 2012

Citations

378 S.W.3d 421 (Mo. Ct. App. 2012)

Citing Cases

Feger v. Russell

Both testified that they had considered calling witnesses at the suppression hearing before deciding against…