From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Featherngill v. Featherngill

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District
Nov 6, 1985
478 So. 2d 106 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1985)

Opinion

No. 84-2486.

November 6, 1985.

Appeal from the Circuit Court, Pinellas County, Richard A. Miller, J.

Steven R. Greenberg, of William L. Lyman, P.A., Clearwater, for appellant.

Joseph R. Park, of Park, Smith and Maguire, P.A., Clearwater, for appellee.


This is an appeal by the appellant/husband seeking reversal of an award of permanent periodic alimony and a provision of the final judgment which provided for automatic increase in alimony when appellant's gross income increased.

Appellee concedes that under the decisions of this court in Condren v. Condren, 475 So.2d 268 (Fla. 2d DCA 1985); McClung v. McClung, 465 So.2d 637 (Fla. 2d DCA 1985); Lewis v. Lewis, 450 So.2d 1123 (Fla. 2d DCA 1984); Ramsey v. Ramsey, 431 So.2d 258 (Fla. 2d DCA 1983); Kangas v. Kangas, 420 So.2d 115 (Fla. 2d DCA 1982), and others, automatic increases in alimony and/or child support based solely on income increases of the paying party are improper.

Accordingly, we affirm the judgment of the trial court, but strike therefrom all provisions relating to future automatic increases in alimony payments. It goes without saying that either party is free to seek a modification of alimony based upon sufficient changed circumstances that may occur in the future.

RYDER, C.J., and CAMPBELL and SCHOONOVER, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Featherngill v. Featherngill

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District
Nov 6, 1985
478 So. 2d 106 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1985)
Case details for

Featherngill v. Featherngill

Case Details

Full title:EDWARD A. FEATHERNGILL, APPELLANT, v. KAY FEATHERNGILL, APPELLEE

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District

Date published: Nov 6, 1985

Citations

478 So. 2d 106 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1985)

Citing Cases

Umstead v. Umstead

We affirm in all other respects. Featherngill v. Featherngill, 478 So.2d 106 (Fla. 2d DCA 1985). Affirmed in…

Stewart v. Stewart

The other issue raised is whether the trial court properly reserved jurisdiction for an automatic upward…