From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Fawley Motor Lines v. Commonwealth

Supreme Court of Virginia
Jan 20, 1958
101 S.E.2d 510 (Va. 1958)

Opinion

39928 Record No. 4745.

January 20, 1958

Present, All the Justices.

Household Goods Carrier — Issuance of Certificate — Point of Origin Restriction Invalid.

Under the Household Goods Carriers Act the Corporation Commission has no authority, when issuing an original certificate of convenience and necessity, to limit the transportation under it to transportation to and from a definite point within the State. Hence the Commission erred in restricting Fawley's original certificate to transportation to and from Shenandoah county.

Appeal from an order of the State Corporation Commission.

Reversed and remanded.

The opinion states the case.

Oscar L. Shewmake, John C. Goddin and Shewmake, Gary, Goddin Blackwell, for the appellant.

Kenneth C. Patty, Attorney General and R. D. McIlwaine, III, Assistant Attorney General, for the Commonwealth.

(Case submitted on briefs)


Pursuant to Code, Sec. 56-338.1 et seq., Fawley Motor Lines, Incorporated, applied to the State Corporation Commission for an original certificate of convenience and necessity as a household goods carrier. By its order the Commission granted the certificate, but limited the holder to the transportation of household goods between Shenandoah county on the one hand, and all points in Virginia on the other hand. From this order Fawley Motor Lines, Incorporated, appealed.

The only issue presented is whether the State Corporation Commission has authority under the Household Goods Carriers Act, Code, Sections 56-338.1 through 56-338.18, to limit or restrict in an original certificate the transportation of household goods to, and from, a definite point within the State. This question was fully discussed and decided adversely to the holding of the Commission in McDaniel v. Commonwealth, (September 6, 1957), 199 Va. 287, 99 S.E.2d 623, and Cook Transfer v. Commonwealth, 196 Va. 384, 83 S.E.2d 733, to which decisions we adhere.

The order of the Commission is reversed and annulled, and the case remanded for the entry of such other necessary order, or orders, not in conflict with the views herein expressed.

Reversed and remanded.


Summaries of

Fawley Motor Lines v. Commonwealth

Supreme Court of Virginia
Jan 20, 1958
101 S.E.2d 510 (Va. 1958)
Case details for

Fawley Motor Lines v. Commonwealth

Case Details

Full title:FAWLEY MOTOR LINES, INCORPORATED v. COMMONWEALTH OF VIRGINIA

Court:Supreme Court of Virginia

Date published: Jan 20, 1958

Citations

101 S.E.2d 510 (Va. 1958)
101 S.E.2d 510

Citing Cases

Park Bros. v. S M Systems

Code Sec. 56-338.11 provides that one who seeks a new certificate as a household goods carrier must prove…

Brooks Transfer v. Turner

The Household Goods Carriers Act "does not require a point of origin to be specified [in a certificate] and,…