From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

FATE v. DOE

United States District Court, S.D. New York
Jul 7, 2008
07 Civ. 9256 (JSR) (S.D.N.Y. Jul. 7, 2008)

Opinion

07 Civ. 9256 (JSR).

July 7, 2008


ORDER


On April 16, 2008, the Honorable Gabriel W. Gorenstein, United States Magistrate Judge, issued a Report and Recommendation ("Report") in the above-captioned case recommending that the complaint be dismissed, without prejudice, for failure to prosecute. Plaintiff has failed to file any objection to the Report and, for that reason alone, has waived any right to review by this Court. See Thomas v. Arn, 474 U.S. 140, 147-48 (1985);Mario v. P C Food Markets, Inc., 313 F.3d 758, 766 (2d Cir. 2002). Accordingly, the Court hereby adopts the Report in full, dismissing the complaint without prejudice for failure to prosecute.

SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

FATE v. DOE

United States District Court, S.D. New York
Jul 7, 2008
07 Civ. 9256 (JSR) (S.D.N.Y. Jul. 7, 2008)
Case details for

FATE v. DOE

Case Details

Full title:FOREST L. FATE, Plaintiff, v. JOHN DOE et al., Defendants

Court:United States District Court, S.D. New York

Date published: Jul 7, 2008

Citations

07 Civ. 9256 (JSR) (S.D.N.Y. Jul. 7, 2008)

Citing Cases

Milner v. Laplante

"Courts have repeatedly recognized that dismissal for failure to prosecute is appropriate where a plaintiff…

Milner v. City of Bristol

"Courts have repeatedly recognized that dismissal for failure to prosecute is appropriate where a plaintiff…