From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Farragher v. City of New York

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Apr 18, 1967
19 N.Y.2d 831 (N.Y. 1967)

Opinion

Submitted April 3, 1967

Decided April 18, 1967

Appeal from the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the First Judicial Department, JOHN L. FLYNN, J.

John P. Carson for appellants-respondents.

Murray L. Lewis, Edward M. Edenbaum and Harry H. Lipsig for respondents-appellants.

I. Sidney Worthman for respondent.


Motion by respondent Nazwin Associates, Inc., granted and appeal dismissed upon the ground that the appeal has not been timely taken. Where the order of the Appellate Division is final, the appeal lies only from that paper and not from the judgment subsequently entered thereon (CPLR 5611; Storch v. Moritsky, 17 N.Y.2d 917), and the last sentence of CPLR 5512 (subd. [a]) is not intended to save a late appeal.

Motion by plaintiffs denied on the basis of O'Brien v. City of New York ( 6 A.D.2d 63) with leave to renew upon the oral argument.


Summaries of

Farragher v. City of New York

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Apr 18, 1967
19 N.Y.2d 831 (N.Y. 1967)
Case details for

Farragher v. City of New York

Case Details

Full title:CATHERINE FARRAGHER, Individually and as Administratrix of the Estate of…

Court:Court of Appeals of the State of New York

Date published: Apr 18, 1967

Citations

19 N.Y.2d 831 (N.Y. 1967)
280 N.Y.S.2d 396
227 N.E.2d 311

Citing Cases

Williams v. Forbes

Although CPLR 5513 does not explicitly designate the person who must serve the order or judgment being…

W. Rogowski Farm, LLC v. Cnty. of Orange

Other judges returned original papers directly to the parties, who were responsible for both filing the…