From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Faro v. Simplex Medical Systems, Inc.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District
Dec 8, 1999
748 So. 2d 342 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1999)

Opinion

Nos. 99-1288 99-1176.

Opinion filed December 8, 1999. Rehearing Denied January 12, 2000.

Appeals from the Circuit Court for Dade County, Steve Levine, Judge, L.T. No. 98-19091.

Edwards Angell and Donna M. Greenspan, for appellant.

Lewis J. Levey and James P.E. Roen and John Trafton, for appellees.

Before SCHWARTZ, C.J., and COPE and SHEVIN, JJ.


Because, contrary to the finding below, the evidence as to the only disputed fact unequivocally establishes that Simplex, Inc. received the required consideration for the issuance of the shares of stock which are now in question, see § 607.0621(3),(4), Fla. Stat. (1999), we conclude that the plaintiff appellant Faro is entitled to the issuance of a writ of mandamus requiring a recognition of his ownership of 460,000 shares of the corporation, Music Tones, Ltd., into which Simplex merged. § 678.4011, Fla. Stat. (1999); Soreno Hotel Co. v. State, 107 Fla. 195, 144 So. 339 (1932); Hern v. Looney, 90 Wn. App. 519, 959 P.2d 1116 (1998); 35 Fla. Jur.2d Mandamus Prohibition § 61 (1996); see also Burtman v. Technical Chemicals Prods., Inc., 724 So.2d 672 (Fla. 4th DCA 1999); Schwadel v. Uchitel, 455 So.2d 401 (Fla. 3d DCA 1984). Accordingly, the order on appeal in case number 99-1288 denying mandamus is reversed with directions to issue the writ. The appeal in case number 99-1176 from an order denying a motion for preliminary mandatory injunction to accomplish the same result is moot.

Reversed and remanded with directions.


Summaries of

Faro v. Simplex Medical Systems, Inc.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District
Dec 8, 1999
748 So. 2d 342 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1999)
Case details for

Faro v. Simplex Medical Systems, Inc.

Case Details

Full title:JOHN FARO, Appellant, vs. SIMPLEX MEDICAL SYSTEMS, INC., etc., et al.…

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District

Date published: Dec 8, 1999

Citations

748 So. 2d 342 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1999)

Citing Cases

Southfields Polo v. McCullough

We do note, however, that mandamus has been approved to compel a corporation to act. See Faro v. Simplex Med.…

SMLX Technologies, Inc. v. Faro

PER CURIAM. SMLX Technologies, Inc. appeals an order issued after remand in Faro v. Simplex Medical Systems,…