From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Farnum v. Harrison

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
May 23, 1916
113 N.E. 1055 (N.Y. 1916)

Opinion

Argued May 3, 1916

Decided May 23, 1916

Hartwell Cabell for appellant.

Louis Boehm for respondent.


Judgment affirmed, with costs; no opinion.

Concur: WILLARD BARTLETT, Ch. J., CHASE, COLLIN, CUDDEBACK, CARDOZO and POUND, JJ. Not sitting: SEABURY, J.


Summaries of

Farnum v. Harrison

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
May 23, 1916
113 N.E. 1055 (N.Y. 1916)
Case details for

Farnum v. Harrison

Case Details

Full title:WILLIAM FARNUM, Respondent, v . WILLIAM H. HARRISON, Appellant, Impleaded…

Court:Court of Appeals of the State of New York

Date published: May 23, 1916

Citations

113 N.E. 1055 (N.Y. 1916)
113 N.E. 1055

Citing Cases

Horowitz v. Winter

In fact, actions at law under section 71 against individual stockholders have been sustained. ( Farnum v.…

Warsen v. Granger

The answering affidavits present triable issues. Whether plaintiff is a laborer, servant or employee within…