rejecting similar contention under similar circumstances, because "[e]vidence about the prior incidents did not make it more probable that [the victim] was motivated to fabricate"
Summary of this case from State v. Montgomery(A65244)(S38653).
January 28, 1992.
PETITION FOR REVIEW DENIED.
rejecting similar contention under similar circumstances, because "[e]vidence about the prior incidents did not make it more probable that [the victim] was motivated to fabricate"
Summary of this case from State v. MontgomeryFull title:Farmers Insurance Company v. Limbocker
Court:Oregon Supreme Court
Date published: Jan 28, 1992
As the trial court surmised, the risk of upsetting a spouse would likely be present as a result of…
Camino Sin Pasada Neighborhood Ass'n v. RockstrohThe easement is limited to reasonable use by the owners of the dominant estate and their guests, not the…