From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Farmer v. Astrue

United States District Court, S.D. Ohio, Western Division at Dayton
Feb 5, 2008
Case No. 3:07-cv-175 (S.D. Ohio Feb. 5, 2008)

Opinion

Case No. 3:07-cv-175.

February 5, 2008


ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS


The Court has reviewed the Report and Recommendations of United States Magistrate Judge Michael R. Merz (Doc. No. 10), to whom this case was referred pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b), and noting that no objections have been filed thereto and that the time for filing such objections under Fed.R.Civ.P. 72(b) expired on February 1, 2008, hereby ADOPTS said Report and Recommendations.

It is therefore ORDERED that the Defendant Commissioner's decision that Plaintiff is not disabled and therefore not entitled to benefits under the Social Security Act be, and it hereby is, affirmed. The Clerk will enter judgment dismissing this case with prejudice.


Summaries of

Farmer v. Astrue

United States District Court, S.D. Ohio, Western Division at Dayton
Feb 5, 2008
Case No. 3:07-cv-175 (S.D. Ohio Feb. 5, 2008)
Case details for

Farmer v. Astrue

Case Details

Full title:MARSHA FARMER, Plaintiff, v. MICHAEL J. ASTRUE, COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL…

Court:United States District Court, S.D. Ohio, Western Division at Dayton

Date published: Feb 5, 2008

Citations

Case No. 3:07-cv-175 (S.D. Ohio Feb. 5, 2008)

Citing Cases

Barringer v. Colvin

Thus, the Court finds the ALJ fully complied with SSR 96-9p in determining that Barringer was not disabled.…