Opinion
October 14, 1997
Appeal from the Supreme Court, Suffolk County (Cohalan, J.).
Ordered that the appeal is dismissed, with one bill of costs payable to the respondents appearing separately and filing separate briefs.
The appellant's motion, characterized as one for renewal and/or reargument, was not based upon new facts which were unavailable at the time of the original motion. Therefore, his motion is really a motion to reargue, the denial of which is not appealable ( see, Bossio v. Fiorillo, 222 A.D.2d 476; Iadarola v Orthopedic Inst., 202 A.D.2d 393; Matter of Pelligrino, 201 A.D.2d 653).
Rosenblatt, J.P., Copertino, Krausman and Goldstein, JJ., concur.