From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Farm Credit of Northwest Florida v. Dilsheimer

United States District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania
Mar 1, 2011
CIVIL ACTION NO. 10-4515 (E.D. Pa. Mar. 1, 2011)

Opinion

CIVIL ACTION NO. 10-4515.

March 1, 2011


ORDER


AND NOW, this 1st day of March, 2011, upon consideration of the Plaintiff's Motion to Strike Certain Affirmative Defenses, or Alternatively, for Judgment on the Pleadings (Document No. 13), the Defendants' Cross-Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings to Dismiss the Plaintiff's Complaint and Opposition to the Plaintiff's Motion to Strike Affirmative Defenses (Document No. 15), and the Plaintiff's Brief in Opposition to Defendants' Cross-Motion or Judgment on the Pleadings (Document No. 16), it is ORDERED as follows:

1. The plaintiff's motion is GRANTED IN PART and DENIED IN PART;

2. The defendants' First, Tenth, Eleventh, Twelfth, Seventeenth and Eighteenth affirmative defenses are STRICKEN;

3. The defendants' cross-motion for judgment on the pleadings is DENIED.


Summaries of

Farm Credit of Northwest Florida v. Dilsheimer

United States District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania
Mar 1, 2011
CIVIL ACTION NO. 10-4515 (E.D. Pa. Mar. 1, 2011)
Case details for

Farm Credit of Northwest Florida v. Dilsheimer

Case Details

Full title:FARM CREDIT OF NORTHWEST FLORIDA, ACA v. ROBERT A. DILSHEIMER, et al

Court:United States District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania

Date published: Mar 1, 2011

Citations

CIVIL ACTION NO. 10-4515 (E.D. Pa. Mar. 1, 2011)

Citing Cases

U.S. Bank, Nat'l Ass'n v. Rosenberg

Cipollone v. Liggett Group, Inc., 789 F.2d 181, 188 (3d Cir. 1986) ("The underpinning of this principle rests…

Tyco Fire Products LP v. Victaulic Co.

It is therefore unsurprising that courts requiring fair notice in this manner have deemed commonplace…