From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Farm Credit Bank of St. Paul v. Finstrom

United States Court of Appeals, Eighth Circuit
Oct 31, 1989
888 F.2d 559 (8th Cir. 1989)

Opinion

No. 89-5365.

Submitted September 5, 1989.

Decided October 31, 1989.

Finstrom, pro se.

Mark S. Ullery, New Ulm, Minn., for appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Minnesota.

Before McMILLIAN, JOHN R. GIBSON, and MAGILL, Circuit Judges.


The Farm Credit Bank of St. Paul filed a complaint in Minnesota state court against Marvin and Geraldine Finstrom seeking restitution of real estate purchased by the bank at a mortgage foreclosure sale. The Finstroms removed the case to federal district court claiming the bank had violated their constitutional rights and their rights under the 1987 Agricultural Credit Act. The district court, on its own motion, remanded the case to state court pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1447(c), concluding it did not have original federal question or diversity jurisdiction, or removal jurisdiction. This appeal followed.

Remand orders "issued under § 1447(c) and invoking the grounds specified therein — that removal was improvident and without jurisdiction — are immune from review under § 1447(d)." Thermtron Prods., Inc. v. Hermandsdorfer, 423 U.S. 336, 346, 96 S.Ct. 584, 590, 46 L.Ed.2d 542 (1976). See also First Nat'l Bank v. Wright, 775 F.2d 245, 246-47 (8th Cir. 1985). Accordingly, this appeal is dismissed. See 8th Cir.R. 12(a).


Summaries of

Farm Credit Bank of St. Paul v. Finstrom

United States Court of Appeals, Eighth Circuit
Oct 31, 1989
888 F.2d 559 (8th Cir. 1989)
Case details for

Farm Credit Bank of St. Paul v. Finstrom

Case Details

Full title:FARM CREDIT BANK OF ST. PAUL, FORMERLY KNOWN AS THE FEDERAL LAND BANK OF…

Court:United States Court of Appeals, Eighth Circuit

Date published: Oct 31, 1989

Citations

888 F.2d 559 (8th Cir. 1989)

Citing Cases

Iowa Lamb Corp. v. Kalene Industries

In general, remand orders issued under 28 U.S.C. § 1447(c) are not reviewable by appeal or writ of mandamus.…

Iowa Comprehensive Petroleum v. Amoco Oil

In general, remand orders issued under 28 U.S.C. § 1447(c) are not reviewable by appeal or writ of mandamus.…