From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Farley v. Overbury

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
May 2, 1938
254 App. Div. 739 (N.Y. App. Div. 1938)

Opinion

May 2, 1938.


Defendant moved to dismiss the complaint of the assignee of certain promissory notes, and for summary judgment, on the ground that the plaintiff was not the real party in interest. The plaintiff, in opposing the motion, produced an assignment valid on its face, showed the circumstances of the transfer and that the notes were delivered to him and had been continuously in his possession ever since the assignment. This assignment was not in the record on a prior appeal ( 252 App. Div. 882), and in other respects additional facts now appear. Order denying motion to dismiss affirmed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements. (See Spencer v. Standard C. M. Corp., 237 N.Y. 479, 480-481; 2 Carmody N.Y. Practice, p. 806, § 502.) Lazansky, P.J., Hagarty, Davis, Johnston and Adel, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Farley v. Overbury

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
May 2, 1938
254 App. Div. 739 (N.Y. App. Div. 1938)
Case details for

Farley v. Overbury

Case Details

Full title:WILLIAM C. FARLEY, Respondent, v. FREDERICK C. OVERBURY, Appellant

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: May 2, 1938

Citations

254 App. Div. 739 (N.Y. App. Div. 1938)

Citing Cases

Overbury v. Platten

On March 25, 1936, the day before the action at bar was commenced, the defendants sold all the Aluminum…

Farley v. Overbury

It was not error, therefore, to preclude defendant from establishing that he would not have made the…