From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Farkas v. Farkas

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Apr 13, 1993
192 A.D.2d 384 (N.Y. App. Div. 1993)

Opinion

April 13, 1993

Appeal from the Supreme Court, New York County (Phyllis Gangel-Jacob, J.).


Questions as to the reference of the contempt issue are moot, there being no dispute that defendant has purged himself of the contempt. It was not error to deny defendant's motion for downward modification of support without a hearing. Although a full hearing should be conducted when a party seeks modification of a prior support order based upon a change in circumstances to determine whether the alleged change warrants modification (Matter of Sharlot v Sharlot, 110 A.D.2d 299, 300), here defendant's papers simply did not present any evidence of any changes. Defendant's claims that he was no longer employed and could not pay the arrears unless the marital premises were sold raised matters that were present at the time of the initial application for support. Moreover, as noted by the court, the proper remedy for any claimed inequities in temporary support is a prompt trial (Cooper v Cooper, 121 A.D.2d 181, 183), here scheduled for April 1993.

Assuming, as defendant argues, that this action to annul defendant's marriage to another woman is not a matrimonial action within the meaning of Domestic Relations Law § 237, and that plaintiff's application for counsel fees pursuant to that provision was therefore defective, authority for such an award does exist under Family Court Act § 438 (a), and, in view of plaintiff's reliance on defendant for support throughout the marriage and defendant's admitted failure to pay any support, it was not an abuse of discretion to award $1,500 for counsel fees.

Finally, denial of defendant's application to sell the marital premises was proper in view of evidence indicating that the residence is owned solely by plaintiff, and also because "courts do not have authority to direct the pendente lite sale of property owned by parties as tenants by the entirety absent a judgment of divorce, separation, or annulment" (Jancu v Jancu, 174 A.D.2d 428).

Concur — Sullivan, J.P., Milonas, Kassal and Rubin, JJ.


Summaries of

Farkas v. Farkas

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Apr 13, 1993
192 A.D.2d 384 (N.Y. App. Div. 1993)
Case details for

Farkas v. Farkas

Case Details

Full title:ARLENE FARKAS, Respondent, v. BRUCE R. FARKAS, Appellant, et al.…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department

Date published: Apr 13, 1993

Citations

192 A.D.2d 384 (N.Y. App. Div. 1993)
596 N.Y.S.2d 42

Citing Cases

Schoharie County Department of Social Services v. Howard LL.

The application by respondent's counsel for leave to withdraw is therefore granted (see,Matter of Bombard v.…

Fabrikant v. Fabrikant

Before: Acosta, J.P., Freedman, Richter and Abdus-Salaam, JJ. The Supreme Court properly denied, without a…