holding that a “study on brain mapping is not newly discovered evidence”
Summary of this case from Davis v. StateNo. SC07-1551.
September 10, 2008.
Lower Tribunal No(s). 92-32105CFAES.
Appellant's Motion for Rehearing is hereby denied.
QUINCE, C.J., WELLS, ANSTEAD, PARIENTE, LEWIS, and BELL, JJ., and CANTERO, Senior Justice, concur.
holding that a “study on brain mapping is not newly discovered evidence”
Summary of this case from Davis v. StateFull title:Anthony Joseph Farina, Appellant(s) v. State Of Florida, Appellee(s)
Court:Supreme Court of Florida
Date published: Sep 10, 2008
I recognize that the supreme court "has not recognized `new opinions' or `new research studies' as newly…
Farina v. StateLater, we affirmed the denial of his initial motion for postconviction relief and denied his habeas petition…