From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Farah v. Motor Vehicles Division

Oregon Court of Appeals
Dec 4, 1991
820 P.2d 466 (Or. Ct. App. 1991)

Opinion

15-900723-11985; CA A68294

Argued and submitted October 31, affirmed December 4, 1991

Judicial Review from Motor Vehicles Division.

Paul G. Dodds, Portland, argued the cause for petitioner. With him on the brief were Raymond M. Rask and Brownstein, Rask, Sweeney, Kerr, Grim DeSylvia, Portland.

Richard D. Wasserman, Assistant Attorney General, Salem, argued the cause for respondent. With him on the brief were Dave Frohnmayer, Attorney General, and Virginia L. Linder, Solicitor General, Salem.

Before Buttler, Presiding Judge, and Rossman and De Muniz, Judges.


Affirmed. Moore v. MVD, 109 Or. App. 195, 818 P.2d 974 (1991).

Buttler, P.J., dissenting.


I dissent for the reason stated in my dissent in Moore v. MVD, 109 Or. App. 195, 818 P.2d 974 (1991).


Summaries of

Farah v. Motor Vehicles Division

Oregon Court of Appeals
Dec 4, 1991
820 P.2d 466 (Or. Ct. App. 1991)
Case details for

Farah v. Motor Vehicles Division

Case Details

Full title:David Brian FARAH, Petitioner, v. MOTOR VEHICLES DIVISION, Respondent

Court:Oregon Court of Appeals

Date published: Dec 4, 1991

Citations

820 P.2d 466 (Or. Ct. App. 1991)
820 P.2d 466