From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Falzon v. Brown

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Apr 5, 2001
282 A.D.2d 498 (N.Y. App. Div. 2001)

Opinion

April 5, 2001.

In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, the plaintiff appeals from so much of an order and judgment (one paper) of the Supreme Court, Suffolk County (Molia, J.), dated July 14, 2000, as granted the defendant's application made at the close of evidence for judgment as a matter of law and, in effect, dismissed the complaint on the ground that the plaintiff's exclusive remedy was under the Workers' Compensation Law.

Feder, Goldstein, Tanenbaum, D'Errico Arnedos, LLP, Cane Place, N Y (Morton H. Feder of counsel), for appellant.

Hammill, O'Brien, Croutier, Dempsey Pender, P.C., Smithtown, N Y (Michael J. Pender and Wade Dempsey of counsel), for respondent.

Before: FRED T. SANTUCCI, J.P., SONDRA MILLER, WILLIAM D. FRIEDMANN, ROBERT W. SCHMIDT, JJ.


DECISION ORDER

ORDERED that the order and judgment is affirmed insofar as appealed from, with costs.

The Supreme Court properly granted the defendant's application for judgment as a matter of law. The defendant, who owned the premises where the plaintiff was injured, was also president of the corporation that employed the plaintiff. Accordingly, the Workers' Compensation Law is the plaintiff's exclusive remedy ( see, Lovario v. Vuotto, 266 A.D.2d 191, 192; Zimmerman v. Optica Mfg. Corp., 268 A.D.2d 584; Vanerstrom v. Strasser, 240 A.D.2d 563; Lawler v. Donnelly, 237 A.D.2d 413).


Summaries of

Falzon v. Brown

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Apr 5, 2001
282 A.D.2d 498 (N.Y. App. Div. 2001)
Case details for

Falzon v. Brown

Case Details

Full title:ANTHONY FALZON, APPELLANT v. BARNETT BROWN, RESPONDENT

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Apr 5, 2001

Citations

282 A.D.2d 498 (N.Y. App. Div. 2001)
723 N.Y.S.2d 859

Citing Cases

Mansour v. Paddock Chevrolet, Inc.

We thus agree with Paddock that plaintiff's claims against it are barred. Paddock correctly contends that New…

Mansour v. Paddock Chevrolet, Inc.

We thus agree with Paddock that plaintiff's claims against it are barred. Paddock correctly contends that New…