From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Falk v. Starr

Supreme Court, Appellate Term
Apr 1, 1900
31 Misc. 756 (N.Y. App. Term 1900)

Opinion

April, 1900.

J. Rieger, for appellants.

E. Lundgren, for respondents.


We think this case was correctly disposed of by the court below on the authority of Bernheimer v. Herrman, 44 Hun, 110, decided in this department, and which, for that reason, we should follow, rather than Sage v. Burton, 84 Hun, 267, elsewhere decided by a divided court.

Present: BEEKMAN, P.J., GIEGERICH and O'GORMAN, JJ.

Judgment affirmed, with costs.


Summaries of

Falk v. Starr

Supreme Court, Appellate Term
Apr 1, 1900
31 Misc. 756 (N.Y. App. Term 1900)
Case details for

Falk v. Starr

Case Details

Full title:CARL A. FALK et al., Respondents, v . NATHAN STARR et al., Appellants

Court:Supreme Court, Appellate Term

Date published: Apr 1, 1900

Citations

31 Misc. 756 (N.Y. App. Term 1900)

Citing Cases

Szwento Juozupo Let Draugystes v. Manhattan Savings Institution

There are conflicting decisions on the question as to whether where a debtor gives a check to his creditor to…

Hutzler v. Hertz Corp.

As indicated in the Annotation previously noted, this rationale has not always been given application by our…