From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Fairclough v. 679 Magenta LLC

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Oct 21, 2003
309 A.D.2d 619 (N.Y. App. Div. 2003)

Opinion

1897.

October 21, 2003.

Order, Supreme Court, Bronx County (Kenneth Thompson, J.), entered June 5, 2002, which granted defendant's motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

Brian J. Isaac, for plaintiff-appellant.

Charles B. Norris, for defendant-respondent.

Before: Tom, J.P., Rosenberger, Lerner, Marlow, JJ.


Plaintiff was injured in a fire in the apartment that she rented from defendant-landlord. She contends that the proximate cause of her injuries was the absence of an operating smoke detector in the apartment. However, it was not the landlord's duty to maintain or replace the smoke detector subsequent to the commencement of the apartment's occupancy (Administrative Code of the City of N.Y. § 27-2045[b]), and plaintiff has offered no evidence to rebut the building superintendent's sworn statement that, immediately prior to the occupancy in question, he installed an operating smoke detector in the subject apartment. Accordingly, inasmuch as no triable issue has been raised as to whether the landlord failed to satisfy the duty it had under the Code to provide a working smoke detector in plaintiff's apartment at the commencement of the tenancy, the complaint was properly dismissed.

We have reviewed plaintiff's remaining arguments and find them unavailing.

THIS CONSTITUTES THE DECISION AND ORDER OF THE SUPREME COURT, APPELLATE DIVISION, FIRST DEPARTMENT.


Summaries of

Fairclough v. 679 Magenta LLC

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Oct 21, 2003
309 A.D.2d 619 (N.Y. App. Div. 2003)
Case details for

Fairclough v. 679 Magenta LLC

Case Details

Full title:PEGGY FAIRCLOUGH, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. 679 MAGENTA LLC…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department

Date published: Oct 21, 2003

Citations

309 A.D.2d 619 (N.Y. App. Div. 2003)
765 N.Y.S.2d 623

Citing Cases

Tucker v. 64 W. 108th St. Corp.

Thereafter, the occupant of the apartment was solely responsible for the maintenance and repair of the smoke…

Taylor v. N.Y.C. Hous. Auth.

The defendant failed to make a prima facie showing of entitlement to judgment as a matter of law. Contrary to…