From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Fairchild Industries, Inc. v. Sievers

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District
Mar 19, 1984
447 So. 2d 393 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1984)

Opinion

No. AU-329.

March 19, 1984.

Petition for review from the Deputy Commissioner.

J. Nixon Daniel, III, of Beggs Lane, Pensacola, for appellants.

Gillis E. Powell, Jr., of Powell, Powell Powell, Crestview, for appellee.


Employer/carrier seek review of a workers' compensation order by which claimant was awarded permanent total disability benefits. We find that the deputy properly excused claimant from the requirement of a work search, and we therefore affirm the order appealed.

While claimant is neither continuously bedridden nor otherwise totally physically incapacitated, the record contains clear medical evidence of claimant's patent inability to uninterruptedly maintain any gainful employment. In such circumstances an effort to find employment would be a futile and useless gesture, and the deputy properly excused claimant from the requirement of a work search as a predicate for disability benefits. See Sizemore v. Canaveral Port Authority, 332 So.2d 23 (Fla. 1976); Chicken 'N Things v. Murray, 329 So.2d 302 (Fla. 1976); see generally Red Oak Farms Inc. v. Scott, 408 So.2d 841 (Fla. 1st DCA 1982).

The order appealed is affirmed.

MILLS, J., and McCORD, Jr. (Ret.), Associate Judge, concur.


Summaries of

Fairchild Industries, Inc. v. Sievers

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District
Mar 19, 1984
447 So. 2d 393 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1984)
Case details for

Fairchild Industries, Inc. v. Sievers

Case Details

Full title:FAIRCHILD INDUSTRIES, INC., FIREMAN'S FUND INS. CO., APPELLANTS, v. GEORGE…

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District

Date published: Mar 19, 1984

Citations

447 So. 2d 393 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1984)

Citing Cases

Philpot v. City of Miami

On the other hand, if the circumstances of a particular case indicate that a work search would be a futile…

Bill's Equipment & Rentals v. Teel

Where an effort to find employment would be a futile and useless gesture, the deputy may excuse claimant from…