From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Fairbanks v. Winik

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Nov 2, 1923
206 App. Div. 451 (N.Y. App. Div. 1923)

Opinion

November 2, 1923.

O'Brien, Malevinsky Driscoll [ Joseph Walker Magrauth of counsel; Dennis F. O'Brien and M.L. Malevinsky with him on the brief], for the appellant.

O'Brien, Boardman, Parker Fox [ Ernest R. Early of counsel; Henry A. Jones with him on the brief], for the respondent Triangle Film Corporation.


For the reasons stated in Fairbanks v. Winik ( 206 App. Div. 449), decided herewith, the appeal herein should be dismissed, without costs.

CLARKE, P.J., DOWLING, MCAVOY and MARTIN, JJ., concur.

Appeal dismissed, without costs.


Summaries of

Fairbanks v. Winik

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Nov 2, 1923
206 App. Div. 451 (N.Y. App. Div. 1923)
Case details for

Fairbanks v. Winik

Case Details

Full title:DOUGLAS FAIRBANKS, Appellant, v . HYMAN WINIK and Others, Defendants…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department

Date published: Nov 2, 1923

Citations

206 App. Div. 451 (N.Y. App. Div. 1923)
201 N.Y.S. 489