From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Fahey v. Whole Foods Mkt.

United States District Court, Northern District of California
Aug 27, 2021
20-cv-06737-JST (N.D. Cal. Aug. 27, 2021)

Opinion

20-cv-06737-JST

08-27-2021

JENNIFER FAHEY, Plaintiff, v. WHOLE FOODS MARKET, INC., et al., Defendants.


ORDER DISMISSING CASE WITH PREJUDICE

JON S. TIGAR, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

On June 30, 2021, this Court granted Defendant Whole Foods Market, Inc.'s motion to dismiss Plaintiff Jennifer Fahey's complaint for false advertising. ECF No. 37. The Court gave Fahey twenty-one days to file an amended complaint, explaining that “[f]ailure to timely file an amended complaint [would] result in dismissal of the claims with prejudice.” Id. at 12.

No amended complaint has been filed. This case is therefore dismissed with prejudice.

The Clerk shall enter judgment for Defendants and close the case.

IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Fahey v. Whole Foods Mkt.

United States District Court, Northern District of California
Aug 27, 2021
20-cv-06737-JST (N.D. Cal. Aug. 27, 2021)
Case details for

Fahey v. Whole Foods Mkt.

Case Details

Full title:JENNIFER FAHEY, Plaintiff, v. WHOLE FOODS MARKET, INC., et al., Defendants.

Court:United States District Court, Northern District of California

Date published: Aug 27, 2021

Citations

20-cv-06737-JST (N.D. Cal. Aug. 27, 2021)

Citing Cases

Warren v. Whole Foods Mkt. Cal.

Reasons (1) and (3) also appear implausible in light of Nacarino v. Chobani, LLC, No. 20-CV-07437-EMC, 2021…