From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Expeditions Unlimited v. Rolly Marine

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District
Mar 28, 1984
447 So. 2d 453 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1984)

Opinion

No. 83-1643.

March 28, 1984.

Appeal from the Circuit Court, Broward County, Louis Weissing, J.

Arthur M. Wolff of Wolff Gora, P.A., Fort Lauderdale, for appellant.

Stanley Marcus, U.S. Atty., and Marilynn G. Koonce, Asst. U.S. Atty., Miami, for appellee-U.S. of America.


Appellant, Expeditions Unlimited, Inc., filed this suit in the circuit court against Rolly Marine Services, Inc., and Aetna Insurance Company for negligent maintenance and conversion of a vessel. It seems the vessel had been placed in custodia legis during an admiralty proceeding. When Rolly Marine refused to comply with an order of the United States District Court to release the vessel to Expeditions, a writ of restitution was obtained and a United States Marshal effected the release of the vessel.

During the present litigation, Expeditions served subpoenas duces tecum upon two United States Marshals for the taking of their deposition. The United States Attorney filed a motion to quash the subpoenas on the ground that Expeditions had failed to comply with the Code of Federal Regulations, which requires persons seeking to depose Department of Justice employees to submit a statement to the United States Attorney setting forth a summary of the testimony and its relevance to the proceedings. The motion to quash was granted and the trial court awarded attorney's fees of $250.00 to the United States.

Expeditions contends that the trial court erred in a) awarding attorney's fees to a non-party and b) in awarding attorney's fees without adducing expert testimony on the value of the services rendered. We agree and reverse.

There is no authority supporting an award of attorney's fees in this case. Fees are allowable to parties on the basis of a contract or statute, or for bringing a fund or property into court. Fees may also be awarded to parties in appropriate circumstances as a sanction. However, the United States is not a party to this suit, nor has any of the aforementioned eventualities been shown to exist.

Accordingly, the award of attorney's fees is reversed.

HURLEY and GLICKSTEIN, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Expeditions Unlimited v. Rolly Marine

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District
Mar 28, 1984
447 So. 2d 453 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1984)
Case details for

Expeditions Unlimited v. Rolly Marine

Case Details

Full title:EXPEDITIONS UNLIMITED, INC., APPELLANT, v. ROLLY MARINE SERVICES, INC.…

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District

Date published: Mar 28, 1984

Citations

447 So. 2d 453 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1984)

Citing Cases

Insurance v. Landa-Posada

Attorney's fees may also be awarded in appropriate circumstances as a sanction. Expeditions Unlimited, Inc.…