From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Exergen Corp. v. Sanomedics Int'l Holdings, Inc.

United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Jun 22, 2016
653 F. App'x 760 (Fed. Cir. 2016)

Opinion

2016-1099

06-22-2016

EXERGEN CORPORATION, Plaintiff-Appellant v. SANOMEDICS INTERNATIONAL HOLDINGS, INC., THERMOMEDICS, INC., Defendants-Appellees

JOEL R. LEEMAN, Sunstein Kann Murphy & Timbers LLP, Boston, MA, argued for plaintiff-appellant. Also represented by ROBERT M. ASHER, BRANDON TAYLOR SCRUGGS, SHARONA STERNBERG, KERRY L. TIMBERS. TIMOTHY DEVLIN, Devlin Law Firm, Wilmington, DE, argued for defendants-appellees.


NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Massachusetts in No. 1:13-cv-11243-DJC, Judge Denise J. Casper.

JUDGMENT

JOEL R. LEEMAN, Sunstein Kann Murphy & Timbers LLP, Boston, MA, argued for plaintiff-appellant. Also represented by ROBERT M. ASHER, BRANDON TAYLOR SCRUGGS, SHARONA STERNBERG, KERRY L. TIMBERS. TIMOTHY DEVLIN, Devlin Law Firm, Wilmington, DE, argued for defendants-appellees. THIS CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is ORDERED and ADJUDGED:

PER CURIAM (NEWMAN, DYK, and REYNA, Circuit Judges).

AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.

ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT June 22, 2016

Date

/s/ Peter R. Marksteiner

Peter R. Marksteiner

Clerk of Court


Summaries of

Exergen Corp. v. Sanomedics Int'l Holdings, Inc.

United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Jun 22, 2016
653 F. App'x 760 (Fed. Cir. 2016)
Case details for

Exergen Corp. v. Sanomedics Int'l Holdings, Inc.

Case Details

Full title:EXERGEN CORPORATION, Plaintiff-Appellant v. SANOMEDICS INTERNATIONAL…

Court:United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

Date published: Jun 22, 2016

Citations

653 F. App'x 760 (Fed. Cir. 2016)

Citing Cases

Exergen Corp. v. KAZ USA, Inc.

In the Brooklands suit, the district court held claims 51 and 54 of the '938 patent ineligible under 35…