From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Excelsior 57th Corp. v. Excel Assocs.

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department, New York.
May 18, 2017
150 A.D.3d 540 (N.Y. App. Div. 2017)

Opinion

4050 113665/09

05-18-2017

Excelsior 57th Corp., Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Excel Associates, Defendant-Respondent.

Kuzman Eisenberg Corbin & Lever, LLP, White Plains (Fred D. Weinstein of counsel), for appellant. Michael B. Kramer & Associates, New York (Michael B. Kramer of counsel), for respondent.


Tom, J.P., Mazzarelli, Manzanet-Daniels, Webber, JJ.

Kuzman Eisenberg Corbin & Lever, LLP, White Plains (Fred D. Weinstein of counsel), for appellant.

Michael B. Kramer & Associates, New York (Michael B. Kramer of counsel), for respondent.

Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (Arthur Engoron, J.), entered August 22, 2016, in favor of defendant, and bringing up for review an order, same court and Justice, entered March 2, 2016, which, after a nonjury trial, declared that plaintiff was obligated to pay for structural repairs to a parking garage leased to defendant, unanimously affirmed, with costs.

The trial court properly declined to entertain expert evidence proffered by plaintiff seeking to establish that the routing and filling of cracks in the concrete slabs located in the parking garage constituted non-structural repairs that, under the parties' lease, were defendant's responsibility. This testimony was precluded by the doctrine of law of the case because the motion court, and this Court on a prior appeal (126 AD3d 479 [1st Dept 2015]), had previously found that these repairs constituted structural repairs of the garage, and were therefore plaintiff's responsibility (People v Evans, 94 NY2d 499 [2000]; Martin v City of Cohoes, 37 NY2d 162, 165 [1975]).

Based on the foregoing, it is unnecessary for us to reach plaintiff's remaining contention.

THIS CONSTITUTES THE DECISION AND ORDER OF THE SUPREME COURT, APPELLATE DIVISION, FIRST DEPARTMENT.

ENTERED: MAY 18, 2017

CLERK


Summaries of

Excelsior 57th Corp. v. Excel Assocs.

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department, New York.
May 18, 2017
150 A.D.3d 540 (N.Y. App. Div. 2017)
Case details for

Excelsior 57th Corp. v. Excel Assocs.

Case Details

Full title:Excelsior 57th Corp., Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Excel Associates…

Court:Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department, New York.

Date published: May 18, 2017

Citations

150 A.D.3d 540 (N.Y. App. Div. 2017)
2017 N.Y. Slip Op. 4046
55 N.Y.S.3d 184

Citing Cases

Koulermos v. A.O. Smith Water Prods.

Those decisions remain the law of the case with preclusive effect. People v. Evans, 94 N.Y.2d 499, 503…

Dugan v. London Terrace Gardens, L.P.

This holding has preclusive effect as the law of the case. People v. Evans , 94 NY2d 499, 503 (2000) ; Glaze…