From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Ex Parte Tomlinson

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas
Sep 12, 2007
No. WR-67,826-01 (Tex. Crim. App. Sep. 12, 2007)

Opinion

No. WR-67,826-01

Filed: September 12, 2007. DO NOT PUBLISH.

On Application for a Writ of Habeas Corpus Cause No. 987198 in the 230th District Court from Harris County.


ORDER


Pursuant to the provisions of Article 11.07 of the Texas Code of Criminal Procedure, the clerk of the trial court transmitted to this Court this application for writ of habeas corpus. Ex parte Young, 418 S.W.2d 824, 826 (Tex.Crim.App. 1967). Applicant was convicted of aggravated sexual assault of a child under 14 years and sentenced to 25 years' imprisonment. The 14th Court of Appeals affirmed his conviction. Tomlinson v. State, No. 14-04-01126-CR (Tex.App.-Houston [14th Dist.], pet. ref'd). Applicant contends that his trial counsel rendered ineffective assistance because counsel failed to investigate Applicant's assertion that his wife was framing him in order to obtain sole custody of the children and failed to investigate and call witnesses whose testimony would have been helpful at the guilt phase, specifically Applicant's father and son and school officials who worked at the complainant's school. Applicant has alleged facts that, if true, might entitle him to relief. Strickland v. Washington, 466 U.S. 608 (1984); Ex parte Lemke, 13 S.W.3d 791,795-96 (Tex.Crim.App. 2000). In these circumstances, additional facts are needed. As we held in Ex parte Rodriguez, 334 S.W.2d 294, 294 (Tex.Crim.App. 1997), the trial court is the appropriate forum for findings of fact. The trial court shall provide Applicant's trial counsel with the opportunity to respond to Applicant's claim of ineffective assistance of counsel. The trial court may use any means set out in Tex. Code Crim. Proc. art. 11.07, § 3(d). In the appropriate case, the trial court may rely on its personal recollection. Id. If the trial court elects to hold a hearing, it shall determine whether Applicant is indigent. If Applicant is indigent and wishes to be represented by counsel, the trial court shall appoint an attorney to represent Applicant at the hearing. Tex. Code Crim. Proc. art. 26.04. The trial court shall make findings of fact as to whether the performance of Applicant's trial attorney was deficient and, if so, whether counsel's deficient performance prejudiced Applicant. The trial court shall also make any other findings of fact and conclusions of law that it deems relevant and appropriate to the disposition of Applicant's claim for habeas corpus relief. This application will be held in abeyance until the trial court has resolved the fact issues. The issues shall be resolved within 90 days of this order. If any continuances are granted, a copy of the order granting the continuance shall be sent to this Court. A supplemental transcript containing all affidavits and interrogatories or the transcription of the court reporter's notes from any hearing or deposition, along with the trial court's supplemental findings of fact and conclusions of law, shall be returned to this Court within 120 days of the date of this order. Any extensions of time shall be obtained from this Court.


Summaries of

Ex Parte Tomlinson

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas
Sep 12, 2007
No. WR-67,826-01 (Tex. Crim. App. Sep. 12, 2007)
Case details for

Ex Parte Tomlinson

Case Details

Full title:EX PARTE JAMES DAVID TOMLINSON, Applicant

Court:Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas

Date published: Sep 12, 2007

Citations

No. WR-67,826-01 (Tex. Crim. App. Sep. 12, 2007)