Summary
In Randolph v. State, 348 So.2d at 863-64, this court reversed the defendant's conviction because the trial court had failed to specifically instruct the jury that the prior inconsistent testimony of the State's primary witness, which had been offered for impeachment purposes, could not be considered as substantive evidence.
Summary of this case from Hooper v. StateOpinion
SC 2698.
August 19, 1977.
Certiorari to the Court of Criminal Appeals, 348 So.2d 858.
WRIT DENIED.
TORBERT, C.J., and JONES, ALMON and EMBRY, JJ., concur.