From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Ex Parte Stanley

Supreme Court of Alabama
Apr 7, 1921
205 Ala. 431 (Ala. 1921)

Opinion

6 Div. 301.

April 7, 1921.

Benton Bentley, of Bessemer, for appellant.

J. Q. Smith, Atty. Gen., for the State.


Those assignments of error most seriously insisted upon by petitioner involve an inquiry as to what evidence was before the trial court and its effect. This court has frequently held that it would not make such inquiry on a petition to review the Court of Appeals. Postal Tel. Cable Co. v. Minderhout, 195 Ala. 420, 71 So. 91.

This court is of opinion that there was no reversible error in the other rulings presented for review. Our judgement is that the trial court properly admitted the testimony of the witness Milliner as to the physical effect upon himself of the assault commmitted upon him by the defendant at the time of, and in the prosecution of, the robbery charged in the indictment.

Application for certiorari denied.

ANDERSON, C. J., and GARDNER and MILLER, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Ex Parte Stanley

Supreme Court of Alabama
Apr 7, 1921
205 Ala. 431 (Ala. 1921)
Case details for

Ex Parte Stanley

Case Details

Full title:Ex parte STANLEY. STANLEY v. STATE

Court:Supreme Court of Alabama

Date published: Apr 7, 1921

Citations

205 Ala. 431 (Ala. 1921)
88 So. 449

Citing Cases

Johnson v. State

Harris v. State, 13 Ala. App. 89, 69 So. 344; Bessierre v. A. C. G. A., 179 Ala. 317, 60 So. 82; Aaron v.…

Heacock v. Arnold

e effect that the same was presented to the court on January 7, 1929, and was signed by W.E. Cox, judge pro…