From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Ex parte Rodriguez

COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TEXAS
May 8, 2013
NO. WR-78,973-01 (Tex. Crim. App. May. 8, 2013)

Opinion

NO. WR-78,538-02

05-08-2013

EX PARTE MALVIN SADLER, Applicant


ON APPLICATION FOR A WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS

CAUSE NO. 10-09-11,312 IN THE 24th DISTRICT COURT

FROM DeWITT COUNTY


Per curiam .

ORDER

Pursuant to the provisions of Article 11.07 of the Texas Code of Criminal Procedure, the clerk of the trial court transmitted to this Court this application for a writ of habeas corpus. Ex parte Young, 418 S.W.2d 824, 826 (Tex. Crim. App. 1967). Applicant was convicted of unlawful possession of a firearm by a felon and sentenced to sixty years' imprisonment. The Thirteenth Court of Appeals affirmed his conviction. Sadler v. State, No. 13-10-00570-CR (Tex. App.—Corpus Christi, delivered August 31, 2011, pet. ref'd.).

Applicant contends that his trial counsel rendered ineffective assistance because he failed to object to the improper imposition of an affirmative deadly weapon finding on his judgment.

Applicant has alleged facts that, if true, might entitle him to relief. Strickland v. Washington, 466 U.S. 668 (1984); Ex parte Patterson, 993 S.W.2d 114, 115 (Tex. Crim. App. 1999). In these circumstances, additional facts are needed. As we held in Ex parte Rodriguez, 334 S.W.2d 294, 294 (Tex. Crim. App. 1960), the trial court is the appropriate forum for findings of fact. The trial court shall order trial counsel to respond to Applicant's claim of ineffective assistance of counsel. The trial court may use any means set out in TEX. CODE CRIM. PROC. art. 11.07, § 3(d). In the appropriate case, the trial court may rely on its personal recollection. Id.

If the trial court elects to hold a hearing, it shall determine whether Applicant is indigent. If Applicant is indigent and wishes to be represented by counsel, the trial court shall appoint an attorney to represent Applicant at the hearing. TEX. CODE CRIM. PROC. art. 26.04.

The trial court shall make findings of fact and conclusions of law as to whether the performance of Applicant's trial counsel was deficient and, if so, whether counsel's deficient performance prejudiced Applicant. The trial court shall also make any other findings of fact and conclusions of law that it deems relevant and appropriate to the disposition of Applicant's claim for habeas corpus relief.

This application will be held in abeyance until the trial court has resolved the fact issues. The issues shall be resolved within 90 days of this order. A supplemental transcript containing all affidavits and interrogatories or the transcription of the court reporter's notes from any hearing or deposition, along with the trial court's supplemental findings of fact and conclusions of law, shall be forwarded to this Court within 120 days of the date of this order. Any extensions of time shall be obtained from this Court. Do not publish


Summaries of

Ex parte Rodriguez

COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TEXAS
May 8, 2013
NO. WR-78,973-01 (Tex. Crim. App. May. 8, 2013)
Case details for

Ex parte Rodriguez

Case Details

Full title:EX PARTE ROSENDO RODRIGUEZ, III

Court:COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TEXAS

Date published: May 8, 2013

Citations

NO. WR-78,973-01 (Tex. Crim. App. May. 8, 2013)

Citing Cases

In re Rodriguez

Rodriguez presented twenty-one claims for relief during state habeas review, including a claim that trial…

Ex parte Rodriguez

This Court denied relief on the claims. Ex parte Rodriguez, No. WR-78,127-01 (Tex. Crim. App. May 8, 2013)…