From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Ex Parte Ray

Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Mar 19, 1935
171 Okla. 154 (Okla. 1935)

Opinion

No. 22768.

March 19, 1935.

(Syllabus.)

Habeas Corpus — Writ Denied Where Application Shows Court Had Jurisdiction to Enter Order of Commitment.

Where it appears on the face of the application that the court below had jurisdiction to enter the order committing the prisoner a writ of habeas corpus will be denied.

Original proceedings by Frank Ray for writ of habeas corpus. Writ denied.

C.R. Reeves, for petitioner.


The application was filed herein August 26, 1931, and alleges that the petitioner is illegally restrained by the sheriff of Stephens county.

The state has offered no brief in this case and the court has had to satisfy itself as to the legality of the order without assistance from the county of Stephens or its proper officers. However, the application shows on its face that the court properly entered its order of commitment. See Ex parte Bowes, 8 Okla. Or. 201, 127 P. 20, and cases following it.

The writ is denied.


Summaries of

Ex Parte Ray

Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Mar 19, 1935
171 Okla. 154 (Okla. 1935)
Case details for

Ex Parte Ray

Case Details

Full title:Ex parte RAY

Court:Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Date published: Mar 19, 1935

Citations

171 Okla. 154 (Okla. 1935)
42 P.2d 234

Citing Cases

City of Okla. v. Balkman

McIntosh et al. v. State, 1924 OK 106, 97 Okla. 134, 224 P. 702.Ex Parte Ray, 1935 OK 273, 171 Okla. 154, 42…