Summary
In Ex parte Nolden, 172 Tex.Crim. 553, 360 S.W.2d 151, the court suggested that relief will only be granted if the facts are undisputed. For the first time, in the recent case of Hullum v. State of Texas, Tex.Cr.App., 415 S.W.2d 192 (1967) the Court considered facts which were disputed.
Summary of this case from Whittington v. GaitherOpinion
No. 34657.
June 6, 1962. Rehearing Denied October 10, 1962.
Appeal from the Court of Criminal Appeals, Belcher, C., J.
Frank B. Kelley, Williams Darden, San Antonio, for appellant.
Charles J. Lieck, Jr., Crim. Dist. Atty., H. F. Garcia, First Asst. Crim. Dist. Atty., A. J. Hohman, Jr., John G. Benavides, Asst. Crim. Dist. Attys., San Antonio, and Leon B. Douglas, State's Atty., of Austin, for the State.
The relator is confined in the penitentiary under a life sentence assessed by a jury on his plea of guilty in February 1938, for the offense of rape.
By writ of habeas corpus presented in accordance with Art. 119, Vernon's Ann.C.C.P., he seeks his release on the ground that he was denied his constitutionally guaranteed right to due process of law.
Hearing was had before a District Judge at the conclusion of which the writ was granted and made returnable before this Court.
There are no undisputed facts which sustain the relator's contention that the conviction is void. Under the holdings of this Court, the conviction may not be attacked as void on the sole ground that the defendant was under 17 years of age at the time of his trial. The right of an accused under 17 years of age to be tried as a juvenile may be waived. Ex parte White, 50 Tex.Crim. R., 98 S.W. 850; Fifer v. State, 90 Tex.Crim. 282, 234 S.W. 409; Ex parte Munoz, Tex.Cr.App., 209 S.W.2d 767.
The relief prayed for is denied.
Opinion approved by the Court.