From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Ex Parte McGraw

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas
Sep 13, 2006
No. WR-64,642-02 (Tex. Crim. App. Sep. 13, 2006)

Opinion

No. WR-64,642-02

Filed: September 13, 2006. DO NOT PUBLISH.

On Application for a Writ of Habeas Corpus, Cause No. C-297-007770-0917808-B in the 297th District Court, from Tarrant County.


ORDER


Pursuant to the provisions of Article 11.07 of the Texas Code of Criminal Procedure, the clerk of the trial court transmitted to this Court this application for writ of habeas corpus. Ex parte Young, 418 S.W.2d 824, 826 (Tex.Crim.App. 1967). Applicant was convicted of aggravated assault on a public servant and sentenced to twenty-five years' imprisonment. The Tenth Court of Appeals affirmed his conviction. McGraw v. State, No. 10-05-00173-CR (Tex.App.-Waco, delivered January 25, 2006, pet. ref'd). Applicant contends that trial counsel was ineffective for failing to investigate a police videotape of the offense. In addition, applicant contends that the State failed to disclose the videotape. The trial court adopted the State's proposed findings of fact and conclusions of law, and recommended denying relief. We believe, however, that applicant has alleged facts that, if true, might entitle him to relief. Strickland v. Washington, 466 U.S. 608 (1984); Ex parte Lemke, 13 S.W.3d 791,795-96 (Tex.Crim.App. 2000). In these circumstances, additional facts are needed. As we held in Ex parte Rodriguez, 334 S.W.2d 294, 294 (Tex.Crim.App. 1997), the trial court is the appropriate forum for findings of fact. The trial court may use any means set out in Tex. Code Crim. Proc. art. 11.07, § 3(d). In the appropriate case, the trial court may rely on its personal recollection. Id. If the trial court elects to hold a hearing, it shall determine whether applicant is indigent. If applicant is indigent and wishes to be represented by counsel, the trial court shall appoint an attorney to represent applicant at the hearing. Tex. Code Crim. Proc. art. 26.04. The trial court shall make additional findings of fact and conclusions of law in regard to applicant's claims that counsel was ineffective and that the State failed to disclose a videotape of the offense. The trial court shall also make any other findings of fact and conclusions of law that it deems relevant and appropriate to the disposition of applicant's claim for habeas corpus relief. This application will be held in abeyance until the trial court has resolved the fact issues. The issues shall be resolved within 90 days of this order. If any continuances are granted, a copy of the order granting the continuance shall be sent to this Court. A supplemental transcript containing all affidavits and interrogatories or the transcription of the court reporter's notes from any hearing or deposition, along with the trial court's supplemental findings of fact and conclusions of law, shall be returned to this Court within 120 days of the date of this order. Any extensions of time shall be obtained from this Court.


Summaries of

Ex Parte McGraw

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas
Sep 13, 2006
No. WR-64,642-02 (Tex. Crim. App. Sep. 13, 2006)
Case details for

Ex Parte McGraw

Case Details

Full title:EX PARTE DESHAWN McGRAW, Applicant

Court:Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas

Date published: Sep 13, 2006

Citations

No. WR-64,642-02 (Tex. Crim. App. Sep. 13, 2006)