Opinion
NO. WR-78,119-01
2013-09-25
ON APPLICATION FOR WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS IN CAUSE
NO. 944756-A IN THE 351 DISTRICT COURT
OF HARRIS COUNTY
Per Curiam .
ORDER
In October 2004, a jury convicted applicant of the offense of capital murder. The jury answered the special issues submitted pursuant to Texas Code of Criminal Procedure article 37.071, and the trial court, accordingly, set punishment at death. This Court affirmed applicant's conviction and sentence on direct appeal. Joubert v. State, 235 S.W.3d 729 (Tex. Crim. App. 2007).
Applicant presents seventeen allegations in his application in which he challenges the validity of his conviction and resulting sentence. The trial court held an evidentiary hearing and subsequently entered findings of fact and conclusions of law. The trial court recommended that relief be denied.
This Court has reviewed the record with respect to the allegations made by applicant. We adopt the trial court's findings and conclusions. Also, with regard to Allegations three, five, seven, nine, and eleven through sixteen, we make the additional finding that claims that should have been raised on direct appeal cannot be reviewed on habeas. See Ex parte Banks, 769 S.W.2d 539 (Tex. Crim. App. 1998). Based upon the trial court's findings and conclusions and our own review, relief is denied.
IT IS SO ORDERED THIS THE 25 DAY OF SEPTEMBER, 2013. Do Not Publish