Opinion
WR-94,099-01
12-07-2022
EX PARTE RAYMOND LADANIEL JAMES, Applicant
Do not publish
On Application for a Writ of Habeas Corpus Cause No. 1071604-A in the 262nd District Court From Harris County
Newell, J. concurred.
ORDER
PER CURIAM.
Applicant was convicted of murder and sentenced to life imprisonment. The Fourteenth Court of Appeals affirmed his conviction. James v. State, No. 14-07-00274-CR (Tex. App.-Houston [14th Dist] Mar. 6, 2008)(not designated for publication). Applicant filed this application for a writ of habeas corpus in the county of conviction, and the district clerk forwarded it to this Court. See Tex. Code Crim. Proc. art. 11.07.
This habeas application was filed in the trial court on October 8, 2012. A timely order designating issues was signed on October 30, 2012. No further action was taken by the county until the application was forwarded to this Court and received in August 2022. There is no indication as to why this application was pending in Harris County for so long without any action by the clerk or the trial court.
Applicant contends that appellate counsel failed to timely inform Applicant that his conviction had been affirmed and advise him of his right to file a pro se petition for discretionary review. Applicant has alleged facts that, if true, might entitle him to relief. Ex parte Wilson, 956 S.W.2d 25 (Tex. Crim. App. 1997); Ex parte Crow, 180 S.W.3d 135 (Tex. Crim. App. 2005). Accordingly, the record should be developed. The trial court is the appropriate forum for findings of fact. Tex. Code Crim. Proc. art. 11.07, § 3(d).
As a preliminary matter, the trial court shall make findings of fact as to why no action was taken by the trial court or the clerk between the entry of the order designating issues and the forwarding of the application to this Court. The trial court shall obtain a response from Applicant as to whether Applicant still wants to pursue this application, and shall include that response in the supplemental record. If the trial court is unable to obtain such a response from Applicant, the trial court shall detail the efforts that were made to obtain a response from Applicant. The trial court shall then return the application to this Court.
If Applicant indicates that he does want to pursue this application, the trial court shall order appellate counsel to respond to Applicant's claim. In developing the record, the trial court may use any means set out in Article 11.07, § 3(d). If the trial court elects to hold a hearing, it shall determine whether Applicant is indigent. If Applicant is indigent and wants to be represented by counsel, the trial court shall appoint counsel to represent him at the hearing. See Tex. Code Crim. Proc. art. 26.04. If counsel is appointed or retained, the trial court shall immediately notify this Court of counsel's name.
The trial court shall make findings of fact and conclusions of law as to whether appellate counsel timely informed Applicant that his conviction had been affirmed and that he had a right to file a pro se petition for discretionary review. The trial court shall also determine whether Applicant would have timely filed a petition for discretionary review but for appellate counsel's alleged deficient performance. The trial court may make any other findings and conclusions that it deems appropriate in response to Applicant's claim.
The trial court shall make findings of fact and conclusions of law within ninety days from the date of this order. The district clerk shall then immediately forward to this Court the trial court's findings and conclusions and the record developed on remand, including, among other things, affidavits, motions, objections, proposed findings and conclusions, orders, and transcripts from hearings and depositions. See Tex. R. App. P. 73.4(b)(4). Any extensions of time must be requested by the trial court and obtained from this Court.