From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Ex Parte Hughes

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas
Nov 21, 1928
11 S.W.2d 319 (Tex. Crim. App. 1928)

Opinion

No. 12270.

Delivered November 21, 1928.

1. — Habeas Corpus — Delinquent Child — Seeking Release.

Where appellant was convicted on a trial before the County Court of Harris County, upon a charge of being a delinquent child, and was committed to the Harris County School for Girls, all the proceedings of the trial being regular, the judgment cannot be disturbed.

2. — Same — Continued.

Art. 1091, C. C. P. 1925, provides that where one is proceeded against in the juvenile court, it is the privilege of the court or jury to substitute as a place of confinement, or commitment any detention home, parental school or school for boys and girls established by such county, etc. We are therefore of opinion that the judgment of the court below upon the habeas corpus hearing remanding her, was in accordance with law, and the judgment will be affirmed.

Appeal from the Criminal District Court of Harris County. Tried below before the Hon. Whit Boyd, Judge.

Appeal from a judgment remanding relator to custody on a habeas corpus hearing, seeking her discharge as a delinquent child.

The opinion states the case.

No brief filed for appellant.

A. A. Dawson of Canton, State's Attorney, for the State.


This is an appeal from an order of the Criminal District Court of Harris county remanding the appellant to the custody of the Harris County School for Girls.

We learn from the record that appellant, Nannie Mason, or as she calls herself Nannie Hughes, was brought properly and legally before the county court of Harris county upon a charge of being a delinquent child, and that after due notice to her parents, in accordance with our statute, and upon a trial not in anywise complained of, she was adjudged by the judgment of that court to be a delinquent child, and was committed to the Harris County School for Girls. Later an application for habeas corpus was presented to the Honorable Criminal District Court of said county seeking to have her released from said school.

Art. 1091, 1925 C. C. P., provides, in so many words, that where one is proceeded against in the juvenile court, it is the privilege of the court or jury to substitute as a place of confinement or commitment any detention home, parental school, or school for girls or boys, established by any county, etc. The judgment of the County Court of Harris county seems in every way correct. The place to which this appellant is committed is one of those enumerated by the statute. No complaint appearing of any irregularity or illegality in any of the necessary steps taken prior to the commitment of this appellant, and it appearing that she was properly committed to the place where she now is, — we are of opinion that the judgment of the court below remanding her was in accordance with law, and the judgment will be affirmed.

Affirmed.


Summaries of

Ex Parte Hughes

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas
Nov 21, 1928
11 S.W.2d 319 (Tex. Crim. App. 1928)
Case details for

Ex Parte Hughes

Case Details

Full title:EX PARTE NANNIE HUGHES

Court:Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas

Date published: Nov 21, 1928

Citations

11 S.W.2d 319 (Tex. Crim. App. 1928)
11 S.W.2d 319

Citing Cases

Collins v. State

As to the statement of facts, which appears to have been filed on the 4th day of September, 1929, the motion…