From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Ex Parte Garcia

Supreme Court of Texas
Oct 24, 1990
795 S.W.2d 740 (Tex. 1990)

Opinion

No. D-0163.

September 6, 1990. Rehearing Overruled October 24, 1990.

Appeal from the 105th District Court, Nueces County, Jack E. Hunter, J.

Juan Perales, Robstown, for relator.

Irma M. Sanjines, Corpus Christi, Jim Mattox, Rhonda Amkraut Bayer, Austin, for respondent.


This is an original habeas corpus proceeding. Fidencio Garcia was found in contempt of court by the 105th district court of Nueces County for failure to pay court-ordered child support. The district court ordered relator jailed, finding that he was $4,151 in arrears. The court failed to specify, however, the time, date, and place of each occasion on which relator failed to pay such child support.

The Texas Family Code provides in Sec. 14.33(a) that if an enforcement order "imposes incarceration or a fine, [it] must contain findings setting out specifically . . . the time, date, and place of each occasion on which the respondent failed to comply" with the child support order. Tex.Fam. Code Sec. 14.33(a). Because the enforcement order does not contain the requisite specificity, it is not enforceable by contempt. Ex parte Holland, 790 S.W.2d 568 (Tex. 1990).

Pursuant to Tex.R.App.P. 170, a majority of the court holds the district court's order void and, without hearing oral argument, orders the court to set aside such order.


Summaries of

Ex Parte Garcia

Supreme Court of Texas
Oct 24, 1990
795 S.W.2d 740 (Tex. 1990)
Case details for

Ex Parte Garcia

Case Details

Full title:Ex parte Fidencio GARCIA

Court:Supreme Court of Texas

Date published: Oct 24, 1990

Citations

795 S.W.2d 740 (Tex. 1990)

Citing Cases

In re Sullivan

We find, therefore, the commitment order is void. See Ex parte Garcia, 795 S.W.2d 740, 741 (Tex. 1990).…

In re Eguia

Therefore, the commitment order is void. See Ex parte Garcia, 795 S.W.2d 740, 741 (Tex. 1990). Accordingly,…