From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Ex parte Dodson

COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TEXAS
Jun 12, 2013
NO. WR-72,525-08 (Tex. Crim. App. Jun. 12, 2013)

Opinion

NO. WR-72,525-08

06-12-2013

EX PARTE VERTEN DODSON, III, Applicant


ON APPLICATION FOR A WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS

CAUSE NO. D-1-DC-07-300805-H IN THE 299TH DISTRICT COURT

FROM TRAVIS COUNTY

Per curiam .

ORDER

Pursuant to the provisions of Article 11.07 of the Texas Code of Criminal Procedure, the clerk of the trial court transmitted to this Court this application for a writ of habeas corpus. Ex parte Young, 418 S.W.2d 824, 826 (Tex. Crim. App. 1967). Applicant was convicted of murder and sentenced to thirty years' imprisonment.

In his present application, Applicant claims to be actually innocent because there was factually insufficient evidence to show he did not act in self-defense. The factual insufficiency argument was raised and rejected on direct appeal. See Dodson v. State, No. 03-08-00108-CR (Tex.App.—Austin Nov. 7, 2008). This application, however, presents a more serious question. This Court's records reflect that Applicant has filed seven prior applications pertaining to this conviction. It is obvious from the record that Applicant continues to raise issues that have been presented and rejected in previous applications or that should have been presented in previous applications. The writ of habeas corpus is not to be lightly or easily abused. Sanders v. U.S., 373 U.S. 1 (1963); Ex parte Carr, 511 S.W.2d 523 (Tex. Crim. App. 1974). Because of his repetitive claims, we hold that Applicant's claims are barred from review under Article 11.07, § 4, and are waived and abandoned by his abuse of the writ. This application is dismissed.

Therefore, we instruct the Honorable Abel Acosta, Clerk of the Court of Criminal Appeals, not to accept or file the instant application for a writ of habeas corpus, or any future application pertaining to this conviction unless Applicant is able to show in such an application that any claims presented have not been raised previously and that they could not have been presented in a previous application for a writ of habeas corpus. Ex parte Bilton, 602 S.W.2d 534 (Tex. Crim. App. 1980).

Copies of this order shall be sent to the Texas Department of Criminal Justice-Correctional Institutions Division and Pardons and Paroles Division. Do not publish


Summaries of

Ex parte Dodson

COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TEXAS
Jun 12, 2013
NO. WR-72,525-08 (Tex. Crim. App. Jun. 12, 2013)
Case details for

Ex parte Dodson

Case Details

Full title:EX PARTE VERTEN DODSON, III, Applicant

Court:COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TEXAS

Date published: Jun 12, 2013

Citations

NO. WR-72,525-08 (Tex. Crim. App. Jun. 12, 2013)