From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Ex parte N.C.

STATE OF TEXAS IN THE TENTH COURT OF APPEALS
Sep 21, 2016
No. 10-14-00102-CV (Tex. App. Sep. 21, 2016)

Opinion

No. 10-14-00102-CV

09-21-2016

EX PARTE N.C.


From the 12th District Court Walker County, Texas
Trial Court No. 26744

ORDER

N.C., a prison inmate, appealed the trial court's order denying his petition for expunction. We dismissed his appeal for failure to comply with Chapter 14 of the Texas Civil Practice and Remedies Code. See Ex parte N.C., No. 10-14-00102-CV, 2014 Tex. App. LEXIS 6642 (Tex. App.—Waco 2014), rev and rem, 486 S.W.3d 560 (Tex. 2016). We denied rehearing, and N.C. sought review by the Texas Supreme Court. N.C. was represented by counsel during the proceedings at the Texas Supreme Court. When the Court reversed our judgment, counsel for N.C. did not withdraw from representing N.C.

By letter dated August 4, 2016, the clerk of this Court notified counsel that the Court became aware of counsel's representation and informed counsel that the Court would no longer communicate directly with N.C. but would communicate with counsel. Counsel was also notified that N.C.'s brief was due on September 19, 2016.

In response to this letter, counsel filed a motion to withdraw and N.C. filed a motion for the appointment of counsel, and in a letter, objected to counsel's motion to withdraw, requested an extension of time to file his brief, requested an acknowledgment that N.C. had been relocated to a different area within the prison unit, and reurged his request for an appointment of counsel.

Counsel noted in his motion to withdraw that the agreement to represent N.C. only applied to the proceedings before the Texas Supreme Court. Counsel asserted that N.C. expressly agreed and understood that counsel would not represent N.C. in any other proceedings, including a proceeding in this Court in the event that the Texas Supreme Court reversed and remanded this Court's judgment. N.C., however, is concerned that without counsel, he will not have enough time in the prison law library or resources to file a brief in his appeal.

Counsel's motion to withdraw is granted, and N.C.'s objection to counsel's motion is overruled. Further, N.C.'s motion for appointment of counsel is denied. However, because of N.C.'s concern about library time and resources, we grant N.C.'s request for an extension of time to file his brief and order the brief filed within 90 days from the date of this order. More time will be granted if necessary and if adequately explained in a motion for extension of time to file his brief. Due diligence must be used to by N.C. to try to meet the extended deadline. We also acknowledge that N.C. has been relocated to the "Mental Health Therapeutic Diversion Program" within the Tennessee Colony Prison Unit.

PER CURIAM Before Chief Justice Gray, Justice Davis, and Justice Scoggins
Motion to withdraw granted
Motion for the appointment of counsel denied
Objection overruled
Motion for extension of time granted
Order issued and filed September 21, 2016


Summaries of

Ex parte N.C.

STATE OF TEXAS IN THE TENTH COURT OF APPEALS
Sep 21, 2016
No. 10-14-00102-CV (Tex. App. Sep. 21, 2016)
Case details for

Ex parte N.C.

Case Details

Full title:EX PARTE N.C.

Court:STATE OF TEXAS IN THE TENTH COURT OF APPEALS

Date published: Sep 21, 2016

Citations

No. 10-14-00102-CV (Tex. App. Sep. 21, 2016)