From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Ex Parte Boots

Criminal Court of Appeals of Oklahoma
Nov 21, 1945
163 P.2d 856 (Okla. Crim. App. 1945)

Opinion

No. A-10649.

November 21, 1945.

(Syllabus.)

1. Habeas Corpus — Criminal Court of Appeals May not Modify Sentence in Original Habeas Corpus Proceeding. The power of the Criminal Court of Appeals to modify a sentence is limited to appeal cases and cannot be exercised in an original proceeding in habeas corpus.

2. Pardon and Parole — Governor Vested With Sole Power to Issue Commutation After Conviction. The Governor is vested with sole power to issue commutation after conviction.

Original proceeding in habeas corpus by Edward Boots to secure his release from confinement in the State Penitentiary. Writ denied.

Edward Boots, per se.

Randell S. Cobb, Atty. Gen., and E. J. Broaddus, Asst. Atty. Gen., for respondent.


This is an original action in habeas corpus instituted by the petitioner, Edward Boots, to secure his release from confinement in the State Penitentiary.

The petition is lengthy and we have given it careful consideration. The petitioner is 68 years of age and has been confined in the State Penitentiary since February 8, 1923, for the crime of murder. The petition is in the nature of an appeal for clemency. There are no facts alleged which show that the judgment and sentence of life imprisonment which the petitioner is serving is void. In substance, the petition alleges that counsel for petitioner, at his trial, did not allow the petitioner to introduce evidence which would have cleared him, and that, under any view of the case, he should not have been given punishment for more than manslaughter.

When a conviction has become final and no appeal has been lodged in this court, the Criminal Court of Appeals may not then modify any sentence assessed against an accused. 22 O. S. 1941 § 1066.

Under the provisions of article 6, sec. 10, Oklahoma Constitution, the sole power to issue clemency after conviction is vested in the Governor.

Since the Criminal Court of Appeals is without authority to grant the relief sought in the petition, it follows that the petition for writ of habeas corpus should be and the same is hereby denied.

BAREFOOT, P. J., concurs. DOYLE, J., not participating.


Summaries of

Ex Parte Boots

Criminal Court of Appeals of Oklahoma
Nov 21, 1945
163 P.2d 856 (Okla. Crim. App. 1945)
Case details for

Ex Parte Boots

Case Details

Full title:Ex parte EDWARD BOOTS

Court:Criminal Court of Appeals of Oklahoma

Date published: Nov 21, 1945

Citations

163 P.2d 856 (Okla. Crim. App. 1945)
163 P.2d 856

Citing Cases

Ex Parte Scharnhaus

It has also been held that the judgment and sentence can not be modified in a habeas corpus proceeding. Ex…

Ex Parte Moore

It has repeatedly been held by this court that the power of the Criminal Court of Appeals to modify a…