From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Ex Parte Bailey

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas
Apr 30, 2008
No. WR-69,700-01 (Tex. Crim. App. Apr. 30, 2008)

Opinion

No. WR-69,700-01

Filed: April 30, 2008. DO NOT PUBLISH.

On Application for a Writ of Habeas Corpus, Cause No. 6175 in the 273rd District Court from Sabine County.


ORDER


Pursuant to the provisions of Article 11.07 of the Texas Code of Criminal Procedure, the clerk of the trial court transmitted to this Court this application for a writ of habeas corpus. Ex parte Young, 418 S.W.2d 824, 826 (Tex.Crim.App. 1967). Applicant was convicted of murder and sentenced to ninety-nine years' imprisonment. The Twelfth Court of Appeals affirmed his conviction. Bailey v. State, No. 12-06-00128-CR (Tex.App.-Tyler, May 16, 2007, no pet.). Applicant contends that his original trial counsel failed to convey a plea offer of twenty-five years, and that his trial counsel at punishment failed to present mitigation evidence, specifically character witnesses. Applicant has alleged facts that, if true, might entitle him to relief. Strickland v. Washington, 466 U.S. 608 (1984); Ex parte Lemke, 13 S.W.3d 791,795-96 (Tex.Crim.App. 2000). In these circumstances, additional facts are needed. As we held in Ex parte Rodriguez, 334 S.W.2d 294, 294 (Tex.Crim.App. 1960), the trial court is the appropriate forum for findings of fact. The trial court shall provide Applicant's trial attorneys with the opportunity to respond to Applicant's claims of ineffective assistance of counsel. The trial court may use any means set out in Tex. Code Crim. Proc. art. 11.07, § 3(d). In the appropriate case, the trial court may rely on its personal recollection. Id. If the trial court elects to hold a hearing, it shall determine whether Applicant is indigent. If Applicant is indigent and wishes to be represented by counsel, the trial court shall appoint an attorney to represent him at the hearing. Tex. Code Crim. Proc. art. 26.04. The trial court shall then make findings of fact as to whether the performance of Applicant's trial attorneys was deficient and, if so, whether their deficient performance prejudiced Applicant. The trial court shall also make any other findings of fact and conclusions of law that it deems relevant and appropriate to the disposition of Applicant's claims for habeas corpus relief. This application will be held in abeyance until the trial court has resolved the fact issues. The issues shall be resolved within 90 days of this order. If any continuances are granted, a copy of the order granting the continuance shall be sent to this Court. A supplemental transcript containing all affidavits and interrogatories or the transcription of the court reporter's notes from any hearing or deposition, along with the trial court's supplemental findings of fact and conclusions of law, shall be returned to this Court within 120 days of the date of this order. Any extensions of time shall be obtained from this Court.


Summaries of

Ex Parte Bailey

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas
Apr 30, 2008
No. WR-69,700-01 (Tex. Crim. App. Apr. 30, 2008)
Case details for

Ex Parte Bailey

Case Details

Full title:EX PARTE MICHAEL EDMOND BAILEY, Applicant

Court:Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas

Date published: Apr 30, 2008

Citations

No. WR-69,700-01 (Tex. Crim. App. Apr. 30, 2008)