From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Ex Parte Atkinson

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas
Mar 21, 1956
288 S.W.2d 89 (Tex. Crim. App. 1956)

Opinion

No. 28256.

March 21, 1956.

Appeal from the Twelfth Judicial District Court of Walker County, Max M. Rogers, J.

Reginald Bracewell, Huntsville, for appellant.

Leon B. Douglas, State's Atty., Austin, for the State.


Relator, an inmate of the Texas Prison System, seeks his release by writ of habeas corpus.

The writ was granted by the Honorable Max M. Rogers, Judge of the 12th Judicial District, and made returnable to this Court in accordance with the terms of Article 119, V.A.C.C.P.

It was shown from the record herein that relator was convicted on December 3, 1935, in the District Court of Hidalgo County of felony theft and repetition of offenses under Article 63, V.A.P.C., and sentenced to life imprisonment.

An examination of the indictment reveals that the primary offense was charged to have been committed on March 15, 1935. The two prior convictions alleged were as follows:

1. Burglary alleged to have been committed on July 22, 1932, which resulted in a conviction in the District Court of Trinity County on June 23, 1933.

2. Passing as true a forged instrument alleged to have been committed on July 5, 1932, which resulted in a conviction in the District Court of Trinity County on June 23, 1933.

It is apparent that since the relator was convicted in both of the Trinity County cases on the same day, neither conviction could have preceded the commission of the offense in the other case and the two convictions could not constitute the basis for a prosecution as a third offender under Article 63, V.A.P.C. Ex parte Daniels, 262 S.W.2d 586.

It is further apparent that the indictment is sufficient to charge the relator as a second offender under Article 62, V.A.P.C.

The punishment in the instant case provided by Article 62, V.A.P.C., is ten years.

Relator has served in excess of ten years and is therefore entitled to discharge. Ex parte Pruitt, 139 Tex.Crim. 141, S.W.2d 333.

The writ is granted, and the relator is ordered discharged.


Summaries of

Ex Parte Atkinson

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas
Mar 21, 1956
288 S.W.2d 89 (Tex. Crim. App. 1956)
Case details for

Ex Parte Atkinson

Case Details

Full title:Ex parte T. B. ATKINSON

Court:Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas

Date published: Mar 21, 1956

Citations

288 S.W.2d 89 (Tex. Crim. App. 1956)
162 Tex. Crim. 546

Citing Cases

Mena v. State

The question did not imply the quality of the reputation, was not answered, and the court promptly sustained…

Harrington v. State

Prior to the penalty stage of the proceedings the court refused appellant's motion to compel the State to…