Opinion
No. WR-36,711-05
Delivered: May 24, 2010. DO NOT PUBLISH.
On Application for Post-Conviction Writ of Habeas Corpus and Motion for Stay of Execution from Cause No. 219-81215-91 in the 199th Judicial District Court Collin County.
ORDER
This is a subsequent application for writ of habeas corpus filed pursuant to the provisions of Texas Code of Criminal Procedure Article 11.071, § 5, and a motion for a stay of execution. In May 1992, a jury found applicant guilty of the offense of capital murder. The jury answered the special issues submitted pursuant to Texas Code of Criminal Procedure Article 37.071, and the trial court, accordingly, set applicant's punishment at death. This Court affirmed applicant's conviction and sentence on direct appeal. Alba v. State, 905 S.W.2d 581 (Tex. Crim. App. 1995). Applicant filed his initial post-conviction application for writ of habeas corpus in the convicting court on April 8, 1997. This Court denied applicant relief. Ex parte Alba, No. WR-36,711-01 (Tex Crim. App. Apr. 15, 1998) (not designated for publication). Applicant's sentence was later vacated by the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit. Alba v. Johnson, 232 F.3d 308 (5th Cir. 2000). At the conclusion of applicant's second trial on punishment, applicant was again sentenced to death. On appeal, this Court affirmed the judgment. Alba v. State, No. AP-71,487 (Tex. Crim. App. Apr. 16, 2003) (not designated for publication). On February 14, 2003, applicant filed in the convicting court his initial application for writ of habeas corpus pertaining to his new punishment trial. This Court denied applicant relief. Ex parte Alba, No. WR-36,711-02 (Tex. Crim. App. Oct. 15, 2003) (not designated for publication). On July 24, 2006, we received applicant's first subsequent writ application in which he asserted that the execution protocol used in Texas would violate his Eighth Amendment right prohibiting the infliction of cruel and unusual punishment. We filed and set the case but ultimately dismissed it holding that such a claim was not cognizable under Article 11.071. Ex parte Alba, 256 S.W.3d 682 (Tex. Crim. App. 2008). On July 14, 2008, applicant moved this Court for leave to file an original application for writ of habeas corpus, again attacking the constitutionality of the execution protocol used in Texas. This Court denied applicant leave to file. Ex parte Alba, No. WR-36,711-04 (Tex. Crim. App. Sept. 24, 2008) (not designated for publication). Applicant filed this, his second subsequent application in the convicting court on May 24, 2010. Applicant presents three allegations in his application. We have reviewed the application and find that applicant's claims fail to meet the dictates of Article 11.071, § 5. Accordingly, we dismiss his application and deny his motion to stay his execution. IT IS SO ORDERED THIS THE 24th DAY OF MAY, 2010.