From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Ewing v. Megrdle

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA WESTERN DIVISION
May 22, 2014
Case No. CV 12-01334 MWF (AJW) (C.D. Cal. May. 22, 2014)

Summary

refusing to address the merits of a motion filed using an improper procedural vehicle because the non-moving party had no meaningful opportunity to respond

Summary of this case from United States v. Gibson Wine Co.

Opinion

Case No. CV 12-01334 MWF (AJW)

05-22-2014

LINDA E. EWING, Plaintiff, v. RANDY MEGRDLE, et al., Defendants.


ORDER ACCEPTING REPORT

AND RECOMMENDATION OF

MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C), the Court has reviewed the Report and Recommendation of Magistrate Judge ("Report") and the objections to the Report. Good cause appearing, the Court accepts the findings and recommendations contained in the Report after having made a de novo determination of the portions to which objections were directed.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

__________

MICHAEL W. FITZGERALD

United States District Judge


Summaries of

Ewing v. Megrdle

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA WESTERN DIVISION
May 22, 2014
Case No. CV 12-01334 MWF (AJW) (C.D. Cal. May. 22, 2014)

refusing to address the merits of a motion filed using an improper procedural vehicle because the non-moving party had no meaningful opportunity to respond

Summary of this case from United States v. Gibson Wine Co.
Case details for

Ewing v. Megrdle

Case Details

Full title:LINDA E. EWING, Plaintiff, v. RANDY MEGRDLE, et al., Defendants.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA WESTERN DIVISION

Date published: May 22, 2014

Citations

Case No. CV 12-01334 MWF (AJW) (C.D. Cal. May. 22, 2014)

Citing Cases

United States v. Gibson Wine Co.

A court should only consider the underlying merits of an improperly designated motion if construing the…