From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Evertson v. Topeka Association for Retarded Citizens

United States District Court, D. Kansas
Jun 30, 2005
No. 05-4046-SAC (D. Kan. Jun. 30, 2005)

Opinion

No. 05-4046-SAC.

June 30, 2005


ORDER


The case comes before the court on the plaintiff's motion pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. Rule 55 for default judgment against the defendant for failure to file an answer within the time allowed by law. (Dk. 9). Rule 55 requires two sequential steps before entry of a default judgment. Canady v. Erbe Elektromedizin GMBH, 307 F. Supp. 2d 2, 9 (D.D.C. 2004); Webster Industries, Inc. v. Northwood Doors, Inc., 244 F. Supp. 2d 998, 1003 (N.D. Iowa 2003). Rule 55(a) specifies the first step: "When a party against whom a judgment for affirmative relief is sought has failed to plead or otherwise defend as provided by these rules and that fact is made to appear by affidavit or otherwise, the clerk shall enter the party's default." Entry of default is a prerequisite to default judgment. Ramada Franchise Systems, Inc. v. Baroda Enterprises, 220 F.R.D. 303, 305 (N.D. Ohio 2004). The burden rests with the party seeking a default judgment to request the clerk for an entry of default and to submit the required proof that the named defendant failed to plead or otherwise defend after being properly served with the complaint and summons. Canady, 307 F. Supp. 2d at 9; Ramada Franchise Systems, 220 F.R.D. at 305; Webster Industries, Inc., 244 F. Supp. 2d at 1003. The second step, pursuant to Rule 55(b), is for the moving party then to seek entry of judgment on the default under either subdivision (b)(1) or (b)(2). Webster Industries, Inc., 244 F. Supp. 2d at 1003.

The plaintiff's motion for default judgment is premature, as he has failed to accomplish the first step of applying for an entry of default with the clerk of the court. In its discretion, a court may direct the clerk to enter default when the premature filing furnishes the required proof. See Ramada Franchise Systems, 220 F.R.D. at 305. The plaintiff's motion, however, does not provide the necessary proof that the named defendant was properly served by accomplishing service upon the attorney, Arthur Palmer. Thus, the court will not direct the clerk to enter default against the defendant.

IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that the plaintiff's motion for default judgment (Dk. 9) is denied.


Summaries of

Evertson v. Topeka Association for Retarded Citizens

United States District Court, D. Kansas
Jun 30, 2005
No. 05-4046-SAC (D. Kan. Jun. 30, 2005)
Case details for

Evertson v. Topeka Association for Retarded Citizens

Case Details

Full title:BRADLEY A. EVERTSON, Plaintiff, v. TOPEKA ASSOCIATION FOR RETARDED…

Court:United States District Court, D. Kansas

Date published: Jun 30, 2005

Citations

No. 05-4046-SAC (D. Kan. Jun. 30, 2005)

Citing Cases

Landrith v. Gariglietti

Whether to direct the clerk to enter default based on plaintiff's premature motion for default judgment is…