From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Ever Higgins v. Tyson Foods, Inc

United States Court of Appeals, Eleventh Circuit
Oct 26, 2006
No. 04-14749-BB (11th Cir. Oct. 26, 2006)

Summary

affirming summary judgment where defendant determined others to be better qualified than plaintiff after a considered evaluation which applied reasonable criteria, and which included independent panel interviews and review

Summary of this case from Venerio v. Fed. Express Corp.

Opinion

No. 04-14749-BB.

October 26, 2006.

Appeal from the N.D.Ala., 196 Fed.Appx. 781.


Denial of Rehearing En Banc.


Summaries of

Ever Higgins v. Tyson Foods, Inc

United States Court of Appeals, Eleventh Circuit
Oct 26, 2006
No. 04-14749-BB (11th Cir. Oct. 26, 2006)

affirming summary judgment where defendant determined others to be better qualified than plaintiff after a considered evaluation which applied reasonable criteria, and which included independent panel interviews and review

Summary of this case from Venerio v. Fed. Express Corp.
Case details for

Ever Higgins v. Tyson Foods, Inc

Case Details

Full title:Ever Higgins v. Tyson Foods, Inc

Court:United States Court of Appeals, Eleventh Circuit

Date published: Oct 26, 2006

Citations

No. 04-14749-BB (11th Cir. Oct. 26, 2006)

Citing Cases

Venerio v. Fed. Express Corp.

[Decl. of B. Alexander, D.E. 33-3, ¶ 8 and Exhibit 1]. But even if, on balance, a reasonable juror could find…

Reilly v. Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation

But even if somehow construed as racial, we conclude that the comments were ambiguous stray remarks not…