From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Evans v. Astrue

United States District Court, E.D. Tennessee, at Winchester
Jan 15, 2010
Case No. 4:08-cv-66 (E.D. Tenn. Jan. 15, 2010)

Opinion

Case No. 4:08-cv-66.

January 15, 2010


ORDER


United States Magistrate Judge William B. Mitchell Carter filed his report and recommendation pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1) and Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 72(b). [Court Doc. 19.] Neither party filed objections within the given 10 days.

After reviewing the record, the Court agrees with Magistrate Judge Carter's report and recommendation. The Court thus ACCEPTS and ADOPTS Magistrate Judge Lee's findings of fact, conclusions of law, and recommendations pursuant to § 636(b)(1) and Rule 72(b).

Accordingly, Plaintiff's Motion for Summary Judgment [Court Doc. 11] is DENIED. Defendant's Motion for Summary Judgment [Court Doc. 15] is GRANTED. The Commissioner's denial of benefits is AFFIRMED and the instant action is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE.

The Clerk shall close the case.

SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Evans v. Astrue

United States District Court, E.D. Tennessee, at Winchester
Jan 15, 2010
Case No. 4:08-cv-66 (E.D. Tenn. Jan. 15, 2010)
Case details for

Evans v. Astrue

Case Details

Full title:DEBORAH EVANS Plaintiff, v. MICHAEL J. ASTRUE Commissioner of Social…

Court:United States District Court, E.D. Tennessee, at Winchester

Date published: Jan 15, 2010

Citations

Case No. 4:08-cv-66 (E.D. Tenn. Jan. 15, 2010)

Citing Cases

Mullis v. Colvin

See e.g., Hahl v. Colvin, No. CIV-12-791-M, 2013 WL 3326178, *7 (W.D. Okla. June 28, 2013) ("ALJ Stults—the…