From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Evans v. Anglin

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS EASTERN DIVISION
Apr 4, 2014
No. 13 C 2425 (N.D. Ill. Apr. 4, 2014)

Opinion

No. 13 C 2425

04-04-2014

WILLIAM EVANS, B08677, Petitioner, v. KEITH ANGLIN, Warden, Respondent.


The Honorable

James F. Holderman,

Judge Presiding.


MOTION REQUESTING THAT JUDGMENT BE SET OUT

IN A SEPARATE DOCUMENT

Under Federal Rules of Civil Procedure 58(a) and (d), respondent respectfully asks this Court to set out in a separate document its judgment denying petitioner's petition for a writ of habeas corpus and declining to certify any issues for appeal. See Doc. 26 (March 28, 2014 memorandum opinion and order).

Rule 58(a) requires most judgments to be "set out in a separate document" — i.e., a document separate from the Court's opinion. The Seventh Circuit's "preferred" vehicle for complying is Form AO 450 ("Judgment in a Civil Action"). Hope v. United States, 43 F.3d 1140, 1142 (7th Cir. 1994), quoted in Brown v. Fifth Third Bank, 730 F.3d 698, 699 (7th Cir. 2013) (Posner, J., in chambers). The Rule applies to denials of habeas relief, and non-compliance extends a petitioner's deadline for appealing by up to 150 days. Carter v. Hodge, 726 F.3d 917, 918 (7th Cir. 2013); see Armstrong v. Ahitow, 36 F.3d 574, 575 (7th Cir. 1994) (applying prior version of rule). Meanwhile, Rule 58(d) authorizes a winning party to reduce uncertainty by requesting that the judgment be set out in a separate document. See Perry v. Sheet Metal Workers' Local No. 73 Pension Fund, 585 F.3d 358, 362 (7th Cir. 2009).

Here, the judgment denying the petition has yet to be set out in a document separate from the Court's opinion. See Doc. 26. Respondent respectfully asks that this step be taken now.

CONCLUSION

This Court should either set out in a separate document the judgment denying the petition for a writ of habeas corpus and declining to certify any issues for appeal, or direct the Clerk to do the same.

Respectfully submitted,

LISA MADIGAN

Attorney General of Illinois

By: __________

MATTHEW P. BECKER, Bar #6299068

Assistant Attorney General

100 West Randolph Street, 12th Floor

Chicago, Illinois 60601-3218

TELEPHONE: (312) 814-5643

FAX: (312) 814-2253

E-MAIL: mbecker@atg.state.il.us

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

I certify that on April 4, 2014, I electronically filed respondent's Motion Requesting that Judgment Be Set out in a Separate Document and Notice of Motion with the Clerk of the United States District Court for the Northern District of Illinois, Eastern Division, using the CM/ECF system, and mailed a copy, postage pre-paid, both to petitioner's last known address at his most recent place of confinement (Danville Correctional Center) and to another address that petitioner recently provided to respondent's counsel:

William Evans, B08677

Danville Correctional Center

3820 East Main Street

Danville, Illinois 61834

William Evans

1428 South Edgewood

Chicago Heights, Illinois 60411

__________

MATTHEW P. BECKER, Bar #6299068

Assistant Attorney General

100 West Randolph Street, 12th Floor

Chicago, Illinois 60601-3218

Telephone: (312) 814-5643

Fax: (312) 814-2253

E-mail: mbecker@atg.state.il.us


Summaries of

Evans v. Anglin

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS EASTERN DIVISION
Apr 4, 2014
No. 13 C 2425 (N.D. Ill. Apr. 4, 2014)
Case details for

Evans v. Anglin

Case Details

Full title:WILLIAM EVANS, B08677, Petitioner, v. KEITH ANGLIN, Warden, Respondent.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS EASTERN DIVISION

Date published: Apr 4, 2014

Citations

No. 13 C 2425 (N.D. Ill. Apr. 4, 2014)